I think this could be summarized as “better to concede the facts while setting the frame than conceding the frame but arguing on facts” (the latter being what your classic cuckservative “muh facts and logic” types typically do).
Parenthetically, if you like cofvefe anon and setting the frame, you’re sure to like his new podcast:
It's not exactly the same thing, come to think of it, but it's similar in that you don't contest the point but you still hold frame, showing you're not upset.
An old ex actually said she used it similarly--"you're a slut!" "yeah, I fucked two guys and a girl on the way here."
"You're a fascist!" "Yeah, I call my girlfriend Gita, short for Margherita Sarfatti, for fun."
I think this could be summarized as “better to concede the facts while setting the frame than conceding the frame but arguing on facts” (the latter being what your classic cuckservative “muh facts and logic” types typically do).
Parenthetically, if you like cofvefe anon and setting the frame, you’re sure to like his new podcast:
https://open.substack.com/pub/framepodcast?r=11s7wd&utm_medium=ios
Isn't this what the PUAs used to call 'agree and amplify'?
Unfortunately, I am not that familiar with their content but sounds similar in name alone…
It's not exactly the same thing, come to think of it, but it's similar in that you don't contest the point but you still hold frame, showing you're not upset.
An old ex actually said she used it similarly--"you're a slut!" "yeah, I fucked two guys and a girl on the way here."
"You're a fascist!" "Yeah, I call my girlfriend Gita, short for Margherita Sarfatti, for fun."
Good stuff.
We do a little monke posting.
100%.